Home | Prompt Gallery | Exam Planner Prompts | 100 Spaced-Repetition Plan Prompts with ChatGPT
Email
Twitter
Facebook

100 Spaced-Repetition Plan Prompts with ChatGPT

Plan spaced repetition with ChatGPT: turn topics into sessions, schedule 1-3-7-14-30 day reviews, and track mastery for higher retention with an SR planner.
Email
Facebook
Students focusing on generating study schedules with their course material with chatgpt

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Share this article:

Creating spaced repetition plans with ChatGPT can help you schedule reviews with your course work that stick. Use these prompts to convert chapters into bite-size sessions, add interval reviews, and lock in mastery with low-friction checklists. Research in the last five years shows spaced practice and retrieval improve grades and long-term retention; see recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses for healthcare and STEM education for effect sizes and classroom transfer (AAMC, 2024; Systematic Review, 2023; STEM Meta-analysis, 2024).

What Are Spaced-Repetition Student Prompts?

These are targeted instructions for ChatGPT that generate study schedules with planned review intervals, recall checks, and mastery targets. They’re for high school and college students, teachers, and professionals who want reliable retention without cramming. They differ from general study guides by sequencing content over time and surfacing retrieval checkpoints. Explore related tools like study-guide prompts and two-week exam sprint planners. Consider our free AI note taker to run these plans end-to-end.

 

How to Use These AI Spaced-Repetition Prompts

Pick 3–5 prompts, paste your source (syllabus, slides, PDF, or notes), then run the steps in ChatGPT or Gemini. Export the plan to Google Docs or CSV when done. New to AI note-taking? Read the Get Started with AI Note Taking to easily get started.

A) Setup, Inputs, and Output Format (1–20)

  1. Create a spaced-repetition plan from my syllabus using 1-day, 3-day, 7-day reviews.


  2. Turn these chapter headings into weekly sessions with 2 active-recall checkpoints each.
  3. Build a calendar of 30-60-10 minute blocks with spaced reviews auto-inserted.
  4. Convert my messy notes into SR tasks with due dates and recall questions attached.
  5. Map each learning objective to a first pass, quick review, and mastery check date.
  6. Generate an SR backlog sorted by prerequisite order and predicted forgetting risk score.
  7. Propose an expanding-interval schedule per topic with 1-3-7-14-30 day spacing.
  8. Export the plan as a two-column CSV: date, task name with recall prompt.
  9. Tag tasks by difficulty using easy, moderate, hard, based on quiz accuracy targets.
  10. Design a minimal daily checklist with today’s SR tasks and two stretch reviews.
  11. Balance subjects so no day exceeds 90 minutes total SR workload across courses.
  12. Insert micro-quizzes for each review using two free-response and one application item.
  13. Create color-coded labels for first-learn, quick-review, deep-review, and mastery checks.
  14. Sequence chapters to avoid same-topic clustering, enabling interleaved SR across weeks.
  15. Define mastery criteria per topic: 80% recall, errorless definition, one transfer example.
  16. Add buffer days for make-ups and spaced catch-ups without overloading adjacent sessions.
  17. Convert lecture slides into SR flashcard batches with planned recall dates prefilled.
  18. Split problem sets into mixed-topic SR mini-sets to prevent blocked practice habits.
  19. Schedule weekly “cumulative review hour” with spaced pulls from prior four weeks.
  20. Output a month view showing first-learns in bold and reviews in italics for clarity.

B) Daily Sessions and Recall Routines (21–40)

  1. Generate today’s SR agenda with timeboxes and two Pomodoros per difficult topic.
  2. Create three active-recall questions per topic aligned to tomorrow’s quick review.
  3. Draft a 10-minute end-session self-test covering all items due within 72 hours.
  4. Suggest retrieval formats: free recall, one-liner definitions, and single worked example.
  5. Interleave two subjects per hour to avoid fatigue and strengthen discrimination learning.
  6. Write three misconception-focused prompts to challenge fragile or formulaic understanding today.
  7. Schedule micro-reviews before meals to leverage context cues and consistent daily anchors.
  8. Generate “cold-start” warmups: two prior-week items before any new first-learn today.
  9. Draft a five-item confidence-rating log to calibrate judgments of learning after reviews.
  10. Add two mixed-topic problems that require choosing the correct formula or method first.
  11. Create a one-page “today’s wins” summary capturing solved confusions and next reviews.
  12. Schedule spaced listening reviews for audio lectures at 1.25× with timestamped takeaways.
  13. Suggest three retrieval cues per concept: analogy, counterexample, and minimal definition test.
  14. Draft a five-minute end-of-day cumulative review from items older than 14 days.
  15. Interleave worked examples with error-finding tasks to strengthen discrimination and transfer.
  16. Convert highlighted textbook passages into recall prompts scheduled across the next month.
  17. Create two “near transfer” tasks applying today’s concepts to novel but similar contexts.
  18. Schedule spaced vocabulary cycles: day 0 learn, day 2 test, day 6 mix-review.
  19. Add five-question exit tickets for self-grading and automatic rescheduling if below 80%.
  20. Generate a spaced checklist for lab procedures alternating recall, rationale, and safety steps.

C) Review Cycles and Interval Tuning (41–60)

  1. Recommend fixed versus expanding intervals per topic based on difficulty and decay risk.
  2. Adjust spacing when confidence is high but transfer performance remains inconsistent across contexts.
  3. Add an interleaved review every Thursday mixing three unrelated topics intentionally.
  4. Schedule quick “two-minute retrievals” on mobile for bus rides and short breaks daily.
  5. Tune intervals using last quiz accuracy: expand after ≥90%, shrink after ≤70% accuracy.
  6. Introduce monthly cumulative exams with pre-scheduled ramp-up reviews two weeks prior.
  7. Blend fixed 7-day cycles with interleaved flashcard pulls from the prior 30 days.
  8. Reschedule any failed recall to tomorrow and in three days with varied question forms.
  9. Add spaced “explain aloud” prompts requiring teach-back in 60 seconds or less.
  10. Insert periodic contrast tasks that force choosing between look-alike concepts or formulas.
  11. Emit alerts when two adjacent days exceed four reviews in the same domain area.
  12. Schedule quarterly refreshers that sample the entire course with light-touch recall prompts.
  13. Add weekend consolidation sessions dedicated to far-transfer, multi-step application problems only.
  14. Propose a “minimal viable review” if time-crunched, keeping next interval effective.
  15. Alternate recall modalities weekly: write, speak, diagram, then solve, to reduce context-lock.
  16. Add “interruption tests” mid-week to ensure concepts survive distractions and task switching.
  17. Increase spacing for well-learned items while keeping occasional long-lag retrieval attempts scheduled.
  18. Cluster tough items before sleep for brief recall, then review again after 24 hours.
  19. Schedule periodic “forgetting probes” where you predict recall, then verify and recalibrate spacing.
  20. Design an expanding-gap schema: immediate, 2-day, 6-day, 14-day, and 28-day reviews.

D) Mastery Targets, Dashboards, and Rescheduling (61–80)

  1. Generate a mastery dashboard with status, next date, last score, and confidence rating.
  2. Flag items below 70% for automatic short-lag reviews and varied recall formats tomorrow.
  3. Promote items above 90% accuracy to long-lag schedules with monthly verification checks.
  4. Rewrite failed recall items as simpler prompts that still demand generation, not recognition.
  5. Suggest minimal hints for stubborn items while preserving retrieval effort and desirable difficulty.
  6. Convert multi-step problems into checkpoints that can pass or fail with quick scoring rules.
  7. Design a weekly retrospective noting error patterns, root causes, and spacing adjustments proposed.
  8. Produce a heatmap of topics by difficulty and next interval length recommendations automatically.
  9. Write mastery exit criteria per chapter including transfer tasks and time-limited solutions.
  10. Draft a monthly checkpoint quiz blueprint allocating items across Bloom levels and topics.
  11. Schedule interleaved “old plus new” sessions to stabilize recall during rapid new learning weeks.
  12. Generate mastery certificates per topic once accuracy, speed, and explanation quality thresholds pass.
  13. Reslot abandoned tasks into the nearest feasible windows without breaking later review chains.
  14. Create escalation rules when two failures occur: shorten interval and change retrieval format.
  15. Propose “maintenance mode” schedules after finals: monthly checks to prevent total forgetting.
  16. Attach rationale notes to each reschedule explaining why the interval changed this time.
  17. Build a weekly export summarizing completions, misses, improvements, and next week’s risks.
  18. Recommend peer-teach sessions for hardest topics, scheduling spaced explain-back rotations biweekly.
  19. Generate a low-friction ritual to start reviews in under 60 seconds every time.
  20. Propose recovery tactics after missed weeks without compressing intervals into unmanageable stacks.

E) Difficult Topics, Misconceptions, and Transfer (81–100)

  1. Identify look-alike concepts and schedule spaced contrast drills with minimal cues provided.
  2. Turn each misconception into three retrieval prompts that require correction and explanation briefly.
  3. Design an interleaved set where only the problem statement signals which formula belongs.
  4. Propose everyday analogies for abstract concepts and schedule spaced retellings across weeks.
  5. Create retrieval tasks requiring error diagnosis of incorrect worked solutions from classmates.
  6. Schedule spaced writing drills converting bullet notes into concise, accurate one-sentence explanations.
  7. Plan mixed-media reviews alternating diagrams, definitions, and quick oral proofs weekly.
  8. Draft scenario questions that force choosing strategies before calculating any numbers or steps.
  9. Convert dense paragraphs into minimal recall cues scheduled at widening intervals each time.
  10. Schedule cross-topic comparisons weekly to strengthen discrimination between near-neighbor ideas effectively.
  11. Add constraint prompts limiting hints to two words to protect retrieval effort quality.
  12. Schedule timed explanations to a study partner using 30, 60, and 120-second variants.
  13. Create “what changes, what stays” prompts for formula tweaks under boundary or unit shifts.
  14. Design multi-chapter synthesis questions and schedule spaced returns until explanations are fluent.
  15. Rotate problem order each review to avoid position cues and strengthen true recall accuracy.
  16. Introduce deliberate distractions briefly to test robustness, then respace according to results observed.
  17. Schedule oral defense prompts where you justify each step and rule out alternatives carefully.
  18. Create exam-style mixed sections that hide topic labels, forcing recognition and selection first.
  19. Design spaced “teach a friend” sessions and include rubrics for clarity and correctness checks.
  20. End with an exam-week ramp: daily interleaved recalls, then two-day, seven-day maintenance.

Printable & Offline Options

Export the plan to Google Docs or CSV, then print weekly checklists. For classrooms, post a one-page SR calendar with color-coded cycles and mastery targets. See more student prompt libraries at Students: Prompt Hub.

Related Categories

What intervals should beginners use for spaced repetition?

Start simple: 1, 3, 7, 14, 30 days. Keep total daily SR time under 60–90 minutes. Expand gaps after strong recall (≥90% accuracy). Shorten after misses (≤70%). Mix retrieval formats—free recall, definition, and application examples—to avoid context lock.

How is spaced repetition different from just rereading notes?

Rereading boosts familiarity but not durable recall. Spaced repetition schedules retrieval at increasing gaps, strengthening memory traces and transfer. Interleaving multiple topics within sessions helps discrimination when problems look similar.

Do expanding intervals always beat fixed intervals?

Not always. Expanding often works well, but fixed schedules can match it depending on difficulty and course pace. Use performance signals to adapt gaps. Promote items to longer lags when recall is strong and stable.

How do I combine interleaving with spaced repetition?

Alternate topics within a session and across the week. Keep at least two subjects per hour and add weekly mixed reviews. This improves choosing the right method before solving, which helps on cumulative exams.

Final Thoughts

Spaced repetition converts studying into a predictable system. Plan first-learns, insert retrieval checkpoints, and adapt intervals using performance signals. This page gives you 100 prompts to build and maintain durable retention across courses. Want more? Start AI note-taking instantly for free with our AI note taker.

Further reading: Association of American Medical Colleges, 2024Systematic Review, 2023SpringerOpen STEM Meta-analysis, 2024

Email
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn

More AI Note Taking from PolarNotes: